|
Post by Nav (GM) on Feb 22, 2019 4:50:45 GMT
No, I'm not. I would if I intended the game to continue anywhere as long as it's run so far.
|
|
|
Post by Nav (GM) on Feb 23, 2019 6:50:11 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Godfred Thraw BayardsKing(GT) on Feb 23, 2019 7:57:40 GMT
i don't see the castle level 2 in Reched just for note to every irish travelers in the north
|
|
|
Post by King Oden Sleibhin of Dumonia on Feb 23, 2019 15:00:36 GMT
It appears that no income is showing up in the P&H for OD's Law, Manor and Trade Holdings in Wessex.
|
|
|
Post by Nav (GM) on Feb 23, 2019 19:05:00 GMT
They look fine on that page. Are you sure it's not just the result of 2 for variable income that makes it look that way?
|
|
|
Post by King Oden Sleibhin of Dumonia on Feb 23, 2019 21:53:40 GMT
Apologies, you are correct - I see that now. Loss of almost 10GB due to the dreaded "2".
|
|
|
Post by Mercia(andreas) on Mar 5, 2019 20:02:55 GMT
I went the PH and noticed that i was missing a Law holding in both Mercia and Essetir, this is properly a bit of confusing due to GLF having blessed his Law holding, so they act as if they were 1 level higher.
|
|
|
Post by Nav (GM) on Mar 5, 2019 22:18:07 GMT
There wasn't any note of that, it just looked like an error. It does seem strange to bless a level 0 holding to make it a level 1, though.
Now that I'm looking at it, I see that Gold Rush will have expired. Who's been casting that?
|
|
|
Post by Mercia(andreas) on Mar 6, 2019 3:47:10 GMT
Umbria was casting it, and the 4GB a turn grant is to have Umbria keep it active.
The blessing of a lvl 0 holding law holding is properly due the tax money.
|
|
|
Post by Nav (GM) on Mar 6, 2019 4:07:37 GMT
It's also a little strange that this means the Law in the province is collecting 120% of the available taxes, but here's the P&H with the extra law and a recast Gold Rush.
|
|
|
Post by Tir Moreth on Mar 6, 2019 6:23:13 GMT
Bless the sacred holding protects against contest?
|
|
|
Post by Mercia(andreas) on Mar 6, 2019 19:38:54 GMT
Unfortunately those extra 20% tax are diminishing the income of other holdingsā¦
In short blessing law holdings to be above standard capacity is a passive aggresive form of economic "warfare".
|
|
|
Post by Nav (GM) on Mar 6, 2019 20:51:26 GMT
Reminds me of when you set the funding for the police in Simcity to 120%. Unless the city is filled with crime, pretty soon you start getting angry messages from people complaining about the police fining people from chewing gum or having bad haircuts.
|
|
|
Post by Godfred Thraw BayardsKing(GT) on Mar 18, 2019 11:12:49 GMT
I have made lot of action in order my stability come to 0... I see -1 ... this is due to the capture of Godfred or this is a mistake ? It ould be hsame that i must execute some new bad administrators
|
|
|
Post by Elyssia Whiterose (SWT) on Mar 18, 2019 16:55:01 GMT
I have made lot of action in order my stability come to 0... I see -1 ... this is due to the capture of Godfred or this is a mistake ? It ould be hsame that i must execute some new bad administrators While much can be done to maintain stability without a proper ruler, good administrators tend to become more and more loyal as the smoke thickens, and especially so when the regent is absent. In fact, they become so loyal they can run your realm for you! Incidentally, SWT could survive about a year and a half or so without a proper ruler before succumbing to -3 stability. Lieutenants can only do so much without the regent's authority backing them up (and will only do so much). (So the answer is that yes, your ruler being captive should result in -1 stability).
|
|