|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Apr 16, 2018 14:21:53 GMT
You had a 0 stability on T20, and you still have a 0 stability on T21. Ok should have gone up to 1 in turn 20 (actually in turn 16 really). I ahd an agenda. Agenda 1: When ToB is removed from Umbria (Except source), Dal Riada and don't have more than a lvl 1 holding (Except source) elsewhere on Albion (not counting the upside down): Completion effect gain one stability. Can I get a confirmation on this. Linde seems to have confirmed it previously in my threat with questions to GM, but I'd like to be certain for my DO.
|
|
|
Post by Mercia(andreas) on Apr 16, 2018 14:27:08 GMT
Maybe it will require a decree to announce victory?
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Apr 16, 2018 14:35:32 GMT
Ok should have gone up to 1 in turn 20 (actually in turn 16 really). I ahd an agenda. Agenda 1: When ToB is removed from Umbria (Except source), Dal Riada and don't have more than a lvl 1 holding (Except source) elsewhere on Albion (not counting the upside down): Completion effect gain one stability. Can I get a confirmation on this. Linde seems to have confirmed it previously in my threat with questions to GM, but I'd like to be certain for my DO. Confirmed The sneaky elves have hidden their superior stability while they were NPC
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Apr 16, 2018 14:35:49 GMT
Maybe it will require a decree to announce victory? if so Mechaumbria really should have used one of their many vacant court actions to do so since turn 16 where it was accomplished ETA:I might write the retroactive decree now the linde has confirmed
|
|
|
Post by Mercia(andreas) on Apr 16, 2018 14:37:34 GMT
Well Congratulations on stability.
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Apr 16, 2018 14:42:18 GMT
Well Congratulations on stability. YEAH!, now for stability 2. Anyone want to take a guess as to what my next agenda is?
|
|
|
Post by Mercia(andreas) on Apr 16, 2018 14:44:47 GMT
I dont know, is your "Ceterum autem censeo Lothia ac Bayard esse delendam. One down one more to go." a hint?
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Apr 16, 2018 14:46:23 GMT
I dont know, is your "Ceterum autem censeo Lothia ac Bayard esse delendam. One down one more to go." a hint? I can neither confirm nor deny things to obvious to need confirmation or allow denial.
|
|
|
Post by Godfred Thraw BayardsKing(GT) on Apr 16, 2018 15:02:03 GMT
things will be simpler, more quiet, and hours when you're dead
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on May 4, 2018 0:16:54 GMT
V1.0 of the P&H ready for review. - please note that if province growth doesn't match what you expected read the news. - if your successful rule action isn't reflected, maybe someone else was more successful than you.
Please let me know any potential issues.
|
|
|
Post by SouthWestern Traders on May 4, 2018 0:31:16 GMT
V1.0 of the P&H ready for review. - please note that if province growth doesn't match what you expected read the news. - if your successful rule action isn't reflected, maybe someone else was more successful than you. Please let me know any potential issues. Missing: Lvl 4 trade in Wessex Lvl 2 trade in Helna Lvl 2 guild in Helna I don't see any competition that would indicate "maybe someone else was more successful than you."
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on May 4, 2018 0:42:39 GMT
Missing: Lvl 4 trade in Wessex Lvl 2 trade in Helna Lvl 2 guild in Helna I don't see any competition that would indicate "maybe someone else was more successful than you." With corrections for missing SWT actions. PH Albion Turn 22 v1.1.xlsx (263.64 KB)
|
|
|
Post by Godfred Thraw BayardsKing(GT) on May 4, 2018 6:26:37 GMT
Hello just to said : Law in reched is non Lvl 4 and Deira was 7 average before +3 agitate (but this +3 agitate it's not me? last turn or TOR ?
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on May 4, 2018 6:32:29 GMT
Hello just to said : Law in reched is non Lvl 4 and Deira was 7 average before +3 agitate (but this +3 agitate it's not me? last turn or TOR ? I think you are looking at T21
|
|
|
Post by Godfred Thraw BayardsKing(GT) on May 4, 2018 6:34:08 GMT
right
|
|