|
Post by SouthWestern Traders on Oct 9, 2016 16:37:47 GMT
I want to say it refers to 5th Ed DnD re: Unskilled Proficient Expert
But with a few exceptions (mostly backgrounds), I can't think of many skills you could bring beyond expert.
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Oct 9, 2016 16:44:11 GMT
Value: (DnD modifier from stat)/2+(proficiency bonus)*(0 if untrained, 1/2 if proficient, 1 if expertised) Example: lvl 5 character, expertise, INT: 18, WIS: 14, CHA: 10 -> strategic: 2+3 = 5. Tactical: 1+3=4. Command: 0+3=3. Example: lvl 5 character, proficiency, INT: 12, WIS: 10, CHA: 8 -> strategic: 0.5+1.5=2. Tactical: 0+1.5=2. Command: -0.5+1.5 = 1. Very helpful, thank you! Trying to reconcile/clarify some terminology between the Regents Guide and 5E. If no training, then = "untrained" If 1 level of Warfare proficiency = "proficient" (x0.5 for Warfare stat calculations) If 2 levels of Warfare proficiency = "skilled" or "expert"? (x1 for Warfare stat calculations). If 3 levels of Warfare proficiency = "expert", "master", or not allowed? (x1.5 for Warfare stat calculations?) If the math calculates out to a Warfare stat of say 2.5, do you "round off" (=3) or "round down" (=2)? Thanks! Only untrained, proficient, expert and master are used. Proficient is having 1x proficiency. Expert is having 2x proficiency. Master is having more. Mastery is extremely rare and need the right background, with the exception of Ply Trade(Administrate) Warfare at Master (×3) is not possible. In Warfare stats all numbers are round down so 2.5 is round down to 2
|
|
|
Post by SouthWestern Traders on Jun 12, 2017 19:02:28 GMT
Question 1: Above it says that the profession (administrate) applies proficiency to the Decree(Finances) action. There is no such action, was it meant to refer to the Finances court action? Question 2: Assuming it does refer to the Finances court action, is there any way to get a lieutenant to take this action? Being a court action it seems kinda tricky As mentioned above it refer both to the Decree(court) with the purpose of generating funds, and Finances(court) actions. You may have your lieutenant spend a character action to oversee the Decree or Finance action in order to apply her proficiency. I'm assuming this means that Profession(admin) does not apply to Decree in general?
|
|
|
Post by Alined on Jun 12, 2017 19:11:46 GMT
My understanding is that court actions, in general, don't involve the regent (or anyone else of note) unless character actions are spent on them. So, if the action is conducted only by the court, with no supportive actions, only the court modifier applies, not any character's skill bonuses.
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Jun 12, 2017 22:00:18 GMT
As mentioned above it refer both to the Decree(court) with the purpose of generating funds, and Finances(court) actions. You may have your lieutenant spend a character action to oversee the Decree or Finance action in order to apply her proficiency. I'm assuming this means that Profession(admin) does not apply to Decree in general? Correct.
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Jun 25, 2017 16:21:37 GMT
added retraining to post nr 3
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Jun 25, 2017 16:33:18 GMT
added retraining to post nr 3 Does this replace what you've written earlier about not being able to normallly retrain non realm affecting profficiencies to realm level affecting? With perception not affecting relam, but performance doiing it?
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Jun 25, 2017 16:49:35 GMT
added retraining to post nr 3 Does this replace what you've written earlier about not being able to normallly retrain non realm affecting profficiencies to realm level affecting? With perception not affecting relam, but performance doiing it? The proficiency still need to be "legal" So you can't retrain intimidation gained from soldier background to estate management.
|
|
|
Post by Alined on Jun 25, 2017 19:07:12 GMT
Oh, good. I was wondering when I should ask about this. Looks like Sir Wulfric is almost done adjusting to his new desk job.
|
|
James Holt (NT)
Northern Traders
Lord of Waffles, Master of the flight of Daggers
The Iron Bank of Albion
Posts: 366
|
Post by James Holt (NT) on Jun 25, 2017 19:14:34 GMT
Does this replace what you've written earlier about not being able to normallly retrain non realm affecting profficiencies to realm level affecting? With perception not affecting relam, but performance doiing it? The proficiency still need to be "legal" So you can't retrain intimidation gained from soldier background to estate management. Why would Kelly McLarnon lose perfectly good intimidation proficiency? It's the Tried & True Ex-Lothian negotiation tactic.
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on May 20, 2018 5:35:12 GMT
So just out of curiosity guild artisan gives bonus to rule trade and rule, but there's no skill that add to those actions. Is that accurate, that guild artisan is the only source of bonus to rule guld/trade holding outside of relam special abilities (and decrees and support actions etc)?
Guild Artisan - Gain a DAC bonus to Rule Holding(guild) and Rule Holding(trade) actions equal to your proficiency
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on May 20, 2018 21:10:21 GMT
So just out of curiosity guild artisan gives bonus to rule trade and rule, but there's no skill that add to those actions. Is that accurate, that guild artisan is the only source of bonus to rule guld/trade holding outside of relam special abilities (and decrees and support actions etc)? Guild Artisan - Gain a DAC bonus to Rule Holding(guild) and Rule Holding(trade) actions equal to your proficiency Correct.
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Jun 3, 2018 8:21:39 GMT
Deception - add proficiency to espionage actions Performance - add proficiency to Agitate actions Charlatan - Gain a DAC bonus to Agitate actions equal to your proficiency Entertainer - Gain a DAC bonus to Espionage actions equal to your proficiency. So deception aff to epsionage logically and performance equally logically adds to agitate. The bacground however are not only the oposite fo the expected. the charalatan backgroudn gives deception and the entertainer gives performance. should the bonuses from backgrounds be reversed?
|
|
|
Post by Mercia(andreas) on Jun 3, 2018 9:33:09 GMT
SWT made a similar point a while ago, i believe to consensus became that while there is merit for a background dac swap, its not 100% clear so just roll with status quo.
|
|
|
Post by Alined on Jun 3, 2018 14:08:24 GMT
It'd make much more sense the other way around, yeah. I assumed the reason it's this way is because the (real) world doesn't make sense right now.
|
|