|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Dec 6, 2017 20:47:31 GMT
Your're right, the uncontrolled penalty was not added
Prosperity in Venicii: 5. -1(tax moderate) -4(Agitation & troops)+2(law negating negative)-0(underlying for 5)-1(uncontrolled) = 1 (+1 temp) = 2.. Fixed
Fixed name error as well, download 1.1 again to get the updated version.
|
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on Dec 6, 2017 23:04:20 GMT
I was being nice and wasn't going to apply the uncontrolled penalty until T16  |
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Dec 8, 2017 4:49:34 GMT
Vasalage transfer of 1 regency from Dal Riada to Umbria isn't included.
|
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on Dec 8, 2017 5:12:56 GMT
Vasalage transfer of 1 regency from Dal Riada to Umbria isn't included. Add your +1 RP and I will ping Linde (x-GM) to update the master file. |
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Dec 8, 2017 15:31:33 GMT
Vasalage transfer of 1 regency from Dal Riada to Umbria isn't included. Add your +1 RP and I will ping Linde (x-GM) to update the master file. file updated |
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Dec 8, 2017 16:56:38 GMT
Also looking at Meinwen her BS dropepd from 32 to 30, something might have happened, but I only think she planned to burn bloodline score by 1.
|
|
|
|
Post by King Oden Sleibhin of Dumonia on Dec 12, 2017 1:59:57 GMT
I am not an excel wiz, but the Dumonia P&H income calculation appears to be off. For Turn 16, it shows Dumonia generated 10.5GB (x80% variable) =net 8.4 GB However, when I go into the individual provinces, OD's income for Turn 16 is: 4.2(Dumonia Regent) +2.9(Dumonia Law) +3.4(Dumonia Manor) +0.3(Alined Law) +2.1(Alined Manor) +1.1(Lyceni Law) +0.6(Lyceni Manor) = 14.6GB (x80% variable) = 11.68GB, a difference of 3.28GB I then checked Turn 15, which shows generated of 13.1 (110% variable) = net 14.4GB, and saw something similar: (Same order as above) 3.6 +6.0 +2.9 +0.3 +2.1 +1.1 +0.6 = 16.6GB (x110% variable) = 18.26GB, a difference of 3.86GB 3.28GB+3.86GB = 7.14GB shortfall for Dumonia over 2 Turns! Turn 14 appears to be correct, so possibly the adding of OD's law and manor holding in Lyceni is when something changed or did not get picked up. I also noticed the Lyceni Source Holdings still need to be fixed (or the fix did not stick). OD should have 2, not 3 Source holdings in Lyceni (lost 1 when the province grew, and OD lost the roll-off) Thanks |
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on Dec 12, 2017 3:20:02 GMT
I am not an excel wiz, but the Dumonia P&H income calculation appears to be off. For Turn 16, it shows Dumonia generated 10.5GB (x80% variable) =net 8.4 GB However, when I go into the individual provinces, OD's income for Turn 16 is: 4.2(Dumonia Regent) +2.9(Dumonia Law) +3.4(Dumonia Manor) +0.3(Alined Law) +2.1(Alined Manor) +1.1(Lyceni Law) +0.6(Lyceni Manor) = 14.6GB (x80% variable) = 11.68GB, a difference of 3.28GB I then checked Turn 15, which shows generated of 13.1 (110% variable) = net 14.4GB, and saw something similar: (Same order as above) 3.6 +6.0 +2.9 +0.3 +2.1 +1.1 +0.6 = 16.6GB (x110% variable) = 18.26GB, a difference of 3.86GB 3.28GB+3.86GB = 7.14GB shortfall for Dumonia over 2 Turns! Turn 14 appears to be correct, so possibly the adding of OD's law and manor holding in Lyceni is when something changed or did not get picked up. I also noticed the Lyceni Source Holdings still need to be fixed (or the fix did not stick). OD should have 2, not 3 Source holdings in Lyceni (lost 1 when the province grew, and OD lost the roll-off) Thanks Province income is taxed by the law holder, but not earned by the regent. It represents the sources of income that are not land (manor), production (guild), temples or trade. In addition, provinces generate income as if it were a holding within that same province. This money represents a variety of valuable behavior not covered by holdings, and is never in play except for the purpose of law collection. Also thank you for reminding me about the source maximums, I hadn't checked it. I have now |
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on Dec 12, 2017 3:26:35 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Maelgwyn ap Cadwgan (TOG) on Dec 16, 2017 17:11:15 GMT
Hello, I was going over holding changes and just noticed something strange about the P&H versions concerning my variable income roll.
Turn 15 1.0 has it as 13, yet turn 15 2.1 puts it at 11 (which is incidently the same as this turn).
Any idea what happened there? If I'm treading a well worn path apologies, I can't really remember anything about this however.
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Dec 16, 2017 18:33:18 GMT
Hi.
This haven't been brought up earlier, but here is what happened:
Turn 15v1.0 was released prior to variable income rolls. So the 13 there was a remnant from t14 variable income roll where you rolled 13.
T15 you rolled 9+2(fall bonus for summer collections) = 11 - All later releases than 1.0 reflect that.
T16 you rolled 11 straight.
|
|
|
|
Post by Maelgwyn ap Cadwgan (TOG) on Dec 17, 2017 5:30:21 GMT
Aha! Thank you for the fast reply Linde. I imagined it was something along the lines of this or a copy issue. I just did not look back far enough it seems.
|
|
|
|
Post by Alined on Dec 22, 2017 10:00:20 GMT
I was pretty slow to notice this, but it looks like Alined's prosperity modifiers this turn and last turn don't add up. If Shadow Ward, Bless, and Light Taxes are all supposed to give a +1 temporary prosperity modifier, there should have been +3 this turn and last turn, not +2. And if there were +6 in net non-temporary modifiers on turn 15, it seems that it should have ended up at 5+3 temporary instead of 4+1, after the automatic deduction (-3 from 'underlying 1') modified by law control (negating -1), which would still be 5+3 instead of 4+2 this turn. Oops.
|
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on Dec 22, 2017 21:33:16 GMT
I was pretty slow to notice this, but it looks like Alined's prosperity modifiers this turn and last turn don't add up. If Shadow Ward, Bless, and Light Taxes are all supposed to give a +1 temporary prosperity modifier, there should have been +3 this turn and last turn, not +2. And if there were +6 in net non-temporary modifiers on turn 15, it seems that it should have ended up at 5+3 temporary instead of 4+1, after the automatic deduction (-3 from 'underlying 1') modified by law control (negating -1), which would still be 5+3 instead of 4+2 this turn. Oops. I'll recheck when I get access to a pc tonight. |
|
|
|
Post by Turn Processing Assistant on Dec 25, 2017 21:16:26 GMT
I was pretty slow to notice this, but it looks like Alined's prosperity modifiers this turn and last turn don't add up. If Shadow Ward, Bless, and Light Taxes are all supposed to give a +1 temporary prosperity modifier, there should have been +3 this turn and last turn, not +2. And if there were +6 in net non-temporary modifiers on turn 15, it seems that it should have ended up at 5+3 temporary instead of 4+1, after the automatic deduction (-3 from 'underlying 1') modified by law control (negating -1), which would still be 5+3 instead of 4+2 this turn. Oops. Sorry for the delay: Turn 15: 1 (Underlying base) -3 (Rebellious) +1 (Partial Law) +5 (Agitate) +1 (Temp Bless) +1 (Temp Shadow Ward) +1 (Temp Light) = 7 - so it should have been 1 higher. Notes: Shadow Ward entered as an event and light taxes missed. Turn 16: 4 (Underlying) +1 (Temp Bless) +1 (Temp Shadow Ward) +1 (Temp Light) =7 I will amend and update the P&H when I get to work tomorrow. |
|
