|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Nov 11, 2015 9:39:28 GMT
In this thread I will post a link to an excel sheet with all domains Provinces & Holdings.
A link to an updated file will be posted between each turn.
|
|
|
|
Post by X - Nature's TBD Embrace on Nov 14, 2015 22:21:12 GMT
Inaccuracy could be a Feature, given Louis XIV's ""I have just lost more territory to my astronomers than to all my enemies." As we likely don't have high-tech 17th century astronomy, our maps might be more on the level of the maps at the front of the Prydain series.
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Jul 25, 2017 9:48:50 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Jul 25, 2017 17:25:16 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Oct 22, 2017 19:52:24 GMT
newest version added above, remember to check for errors
|
|
|
|
Post by Alined on Oct 22, 2017 22:44:49 GMT
I think the temple tax in Wessex is supposed to be No, since that's a 10% lower rate than Light. Unless Alined conveniently found it not possible to adjust both tax rates at the same time, though that sounds like a minor treaty breach. The P&H says Turbulent means no growth, was the 6 GB of growth from the 6 units overseas disbanding successfully? It looks like Nemeth received growth, too, so maybe it's not that.
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Oct 23, 2017 22:19:01 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by ET (Kerberos) on Oct 24, 2017 18:15:29 GMT
P&H does not reflext 1 RP tranfer of RP from Dál RIada to Umbria after succesfull vassalage.
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Oct 24, 2017 20:24:26 GMT
fixed
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Nov 19, 2017 15:08:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Dec 6, 2017 19:32:33 GMT
|
|
James Holt (NT)
Northern Traders
Lord of Waffles, Master of the flight of Daggers
The Iron Bank of Albion
Posts: 366 
|
Post by James Holt (NT) on Dec 6, 2017 20:00:31 GMT
Northern traders generated regency has gone from 26 regency in turn 15 to 18 regency in turn 16. Even though both our bloodline and # of guild holdings increased. What gives?
Bernicia had guild+trade ruled, so I don't understand the "elves are upset NT isn't ruling bernicia" news
|
|
|
|
Post by Linde (x-GM) on Dec 6, 2017 20:21:24 GMT
Northern traders generated regency has gone from 26 regency in turn 15 to 18 regency in turn 16. Even though both our bloodline and # of guild holdings increased. What gives? Bernicia had guild+trade ruled, so I don't understand the "elves are upset NT isn't ruling bernicia" news Error in the formula as an update messed up collections. News dont say that your guilders in Bernicia are upset that you aren't ruling Bernicia. News say that your guilders in Bernicia are of the understanding that they should have profited more this turn. V1.1: www.dropbox.com/s/7oz5myqm2s07yho/PH%20Albion%20Turn%2016%20v1.1.xlsx?dl=0With correct regency formula and indication of what provinces are affected by events. |
|
|
|
Post by Alined on Dec 6, 2017 20:31:47 GMT
Yeah, something happened there for me, too. Alined has the same number of holdings as before, and is collecting 2 RP from the contract, but it said it collected 4 more RP. That's fixed, now.
I've been confused about Venicii, I thought the base province level was 4. Since it's 3, they do have full law control. But it looks like their prosperity level should still be rock bottom, since there's -1 from the uncontrolled province's moderate tax rate, -1 from the province being uncontrolled, -2 from troops, and -2 from negative agitation. So, even after negating -2 of those penalties with law control, the province doesn't have that many prosperity levels to lose.
This is just a style thing, but the colour coding for the CSF isn't applied to the regent's name field. Since 'Lady' is no longer Alauna's title, and no one else has their title included in the name field, 'Alauna ferch Dunstan' might be better to put in that name field. Or just 'Alauna' with an epithet added by the CSF, like how Radgb was 'Radgb Blessed-by-Flame'. 'Alura' is pretty distant spelling from 'Alauna', anyway.
|
|
